Microsoft Hyper-V vs Parallels
We've analyzed the technical infrastructure and pricing tiers of both Microsoft Hyper-V and Parallels to see which comes out on top for Virtualization Software.
Microsoft Hyper-V
Windows Enterprise Users
Native hypervisor allowing you to run multiple operating systems as virtual machines on Windows.
95% Verified
Included with Windows Pro/Enterprise
Highs
- Included with Windows Pro/Enterprise
- Excellent performance for Windows guests
- Deep OS integration
Lows
- Can conflict with other hypervisors
- Linux support is improving but not perfect
Featured Capabilities
- Native Windows integration
- Hardware virtualization
- Live migration
- Dynamic memory
Plans from Included with Windows Pro/Ent
Parallels
Mac Users Needing Windows Apps
The industry-leading software for running Windows, Linux, and other operating systems directly on your Mac without rebooting.
95% Verified
Available
Highs
- Incredibly fast performance on Mac
- Runs Windows apps as if they were native
- Extremely easy setup process
Lows
- Subscription model can be pricey
- Requires sufficient RAM for smooth operation
Featured Capabilities
- Seamless Mac & Windows integration
- Coherence mode to hide Windows background
- One-click automated OS installation
- Optimized for Apple M-series chips
Plans from Starts from $99.99/yr
The Final Verdict
After a head-to-head comparison of Microsoft Hyper-V and Parallels, the choice ultimately depends on your priority. If you value Included with Windows Pro/Enterprise, then Microsoft Hyper-V is your clear winner. However, if Incredibly fast performance on Mac is your main goal, Parallels might be the better fit.